<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Television is healthier than ever, just a little paranoid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://edwardboches.com/television-is-healthier-than-ever-just-a-little-paranoid/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://edwardboches.com/television-is-healthier-than-ever-just-a-little-paranoid</link>
	<description>Marketing ideas for navigating a consumer driven world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:00:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: edward boches</title>
		<link>http://edwardboches.com/television-is-healthier-than-ever-just-a-little-paranoid/comment-page-1#comment-441</link>
		<dc:creator>edward boches</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 18:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edwardboches.com/?p=622#comment-441</guid>
		<description>Joe:
Great comment.  Agree totally.  I&#039;m a huge believer in embracing change (in fact we&#039;ve made that a big part of Mullen&#039;s culture.  I&#039;m stunned how many companies resist.  I heard a great quote yesterday from a client, Ron Shaich, the CEO at Panera.  He said &quot;Most companies only like to do what they&#039;re good at and they won&#039;t try anything they&#039;re not good at.&quot;  It&#039;s just another way of saying too many marketers or media get stuck doing the same thing over and over.  That&#039;s just a formula for obsolescence or irrelevance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe:<br />
Great comment.  Agree totally.  I&#8217;m a huge believer in embracing change (in fact we&#8217;ve made that a big part of Mullen&#8217;s culture.  I&#8217;m stunned how many companies resist.  I heard a great quote yesterday from a client, Ron Shaich, the CEO at Panera.  He said &#8220;Most companies only like to do what they&#8217;re good at and they won&#8217;t try anything they&#8217;re not good at.&#8221;  It&#8217;s just another way of saying too many marketers or media get stuck doing the same thing over and over.  That&#8217;s just a formula for obsolescence or irrelevance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Jacobi</title>
		<link>http://edwardboches.com/television-is-healthier-than-ever-just-a-little-paranoid/comment-page-1#comment-439</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Jacobi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 11:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edwardboches.com/?p=622#comment-439</guid>
		<description>Thanks for an interesting post and equally interesting comments. From my short time working in television so far, one of the interesting elements I&#039;ve observed is how multi-generational the industry is. We tend to think of television as this exciting, fast-changing medium. But there are lots of older executives, station owners, attorneys that did really well in televison years ago and have been resistant to change. I see the effect of that comes out in their programming, especially local news, and the product is not good. 

Jonathan asks a good question about the allocation of ad/marketing dollars. Where I live, I don&#039;t think local television is suffering from an economy problem. I think it suffers from a &quot;resistance to change&quot; problem. Right now, if I oversaw a local ad/marketing campaign and budget, I&#039;d be looking at just about every other medium until I see local television making an effort to live in the community that I&#039;m living in. For now, it seems a world apart.

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Joe Jacobi’s last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://joejacobi.com/?p=149&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Do Performance Cuts Really Help Us Perform?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for an interesting post and equally interesting comments. From my short time working in television so far, one of the interesting elements I&#8217;ve observed is how multi-generational the industry is. We tend to think of television as this exciting, fast-changing medium. But there are lots of older executives, station owners, attorneys that did really well in televison years ago and have been resistant to change. I see the effect of that comes out in their programming, especially local news, and the product is not good. </p>
<p>Jonathan asks a good question about the allocation of ad/marketing dollars. Where I live, I don&#8217;t think local television is suffering from an economy problem. I think it suffers from a &#8220;resistance to change&#8221; problem. Right now, if I oversaw a local ad/marketing campaign and budget, I&#8217;d be looking at just about every other medium until I see local television making an effort to live in the community that I&#8217;m living in. For now, it seems a world apart.</p>
<p><abbr><em>Joe Jacobi’s last blog post..<a href="http://joejacobi.com/?p=149" rel="nofollow">Do Performance Cuts Really Help Us Perform?</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: edward boches</title>
		<link>http://edwardboches.com/television-is-healthier-than-ever-just-a-little-paranoid/comment-page-1#comment-435</link>
		<dc:creator>edward boches</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 23:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edwardboches.com/?p=622#comment-435</guid>
		<description>Jonathan, 
All good points.  I think the trick is figuring out the balance among and between everything.  There is probably a perfect balance of broad reach and awareness, trackable digital, and the power of deepening a relationship with fans and followers who might become advocates on your behalf.  Not sure anyone knows that exact formula, but you may want a really good analytics person on your team.  In the meantime, we can continue to assume that each medium will try as hard as possible to sell its virtues while attemting to question the value of the alternatives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonathan,<br />
All good points.  I think the trick is figuring out the balance among and between everything.  There is probably a perfect balance of broad reach and awareness, trackable digital, and the power of deepening a relationship with fans and followers who might become advocates on your behalf.  Not sure anyone knows that exact formula, but you may want a really good analytics person on your team.  In the meantime, we can continue to assume that each medium will try as hard as possible to sell its virtues while attemting to question the value of the alternatives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Fields</title>
		<link>http://edwardboches.com/television-is-healthier-than-ever-just-a-little-paranoid/comment-page-1#comment-434</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Fields</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 21:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edwardboches.com/?p=622#comment-434</guid>
		<description>Agreed, TV&#039;s not going Chapter 7 quite yet. But, the bigger question is, if you&#039;ve got $X million to spend, is TV still the RIGHT place to put it with so many more options? 

Will you get better &quot;awareness, interest, purchase consideration, not to mention store and website traffic&quot; elsewhere AND have a far more trackable response rate and ROI data if you allocate your spend differently.

So, it&#039;s not whether it still works, but whether it still works well enough compared to the latest shiny objects in town?

PS - Mark Twain said it best, &quot;There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and Rohrs&#039; statistics.&quot;

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Jonathan Fields’s last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CareerRenegade/~3/xoRYANP33AI/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Career Renegade TV: Jason Lamberth Goes Natural&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed, TV&#8217;s not going Chapter 7 quite yet. But, the bigger question is, if you&#8217;ve got $X million to spend, is TV still the RIGHT place to put it with so many more options? </p>
<p>Will you get better &#8220;awareness, interest, purchase consideration, not to mention store and website traffic&#8221; elsewhere AND have a far more trackable response rate and ROI data if you allocate your spend differently.</p>
<p>So, it&#8217;s not whether it still works, but whether it still works well enough compared to the latest shiny objects in town?</p>
<p>PS &#8211; Mark Twain said it best, &#8220;There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and Rohrs&#8217; statistics.&#8221;</p>
<p><abbr><em>Jonathan Fields’s last blog post..<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CareerRenegade/~3/xoRYANP33AI/" rel="nofollow">Career Renegade TV: Jason Lamberth Goes Natural</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: edward boches</title>
		<link>http://edwardboches.com/television-is-healthier-than-ever-just-a-little-paranoid/comment-page-1#comment-433</link>
		<dc:creator>edward boches</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 21:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edwardboches.com/?p=622#comment-433</guid>
		<description>I actually think there&#039;s pretty good TV these days, MadMen, Brotherhood, Damages, Dexter, In Treatment.  But none of them run ads or don&#039;t require you to watch them.  Means you better make damn good ads that people seek out, or get your brand into all the other places it can connect with consumers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually think there&#8217;s pretty good TV these days, MadMen, Brotherhood, Damages, Dexter, In Treatment.  But none of them run ads or don&#8217;t require you to watch them.  Means you better make damn good ads that people seek out, or get your brand into all the other places it can connect with consumers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim @smashadv</title>
		<link>http://edwardboches.com/television-is-healthier-than-ever-just-a-little-paranoid/comment-page-1#comment-432</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim @smashadv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 18:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edwardboches.com/?p=622#comment-432</guid>
		<description>Edward – well stated! When you first reported this news on Tuesday, I responded with the fact I watch less TV now than I ever have and how could this be? Then I thought about how Nielson serves only the medium (not necessarily advertisers, and certainly not consumers) and how antiquated the Nielson credibility really is. I agree, TV advertising is never going to go away because of the reasons you state here. But as long as networks keep pumping out trash (mostly), I&#039;ll continue to only watch sports programming (the original reality television).

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Jim @smashadv’s last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ObsessedWithConformity/~3/A7j25y9Vgrk/the-life-and-death-of-the-big-idea.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Life and Death of the Big Idea&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Edward – well stated! When you first reported this news on Tuesday, I responded with the fact I watch less TV now than I ever have and how could this be? Then I thought about how Nielson serves only the medium (not necessarily advertisers, and certainly not consumers) and how antiquated the Nielson credibility really is. I agree, TV advertising is never going to go away because of the reasons you state here. But as long as networks keep pumping out trash (mostly), I&#8217;ll continue to only watch sports programming (the original reality television).</p>
<p><abbr><em>Jim @smashadv’s last blog post..<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ObsessedWithConformity/~3/A7j25y9Vgrk/the-life-and-death-of-the-big-idea.html" rel="nofollow">The Life and Death of the Big Idea</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: edward boches</title>
		<link>http://edwardboches.com/television-is-healthier-than-ever-just-a-little-paranoid/comment-page-1#comment-431</link>
		<dc:creator>edward boches</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 17:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edwardboches.com/?p=622#comment-431</guid>
		<description>For one thing, some of the stats probably only measure the TV being turned on rather than actively watched.  Second, we are in the midst of a recession with high unemployment (folks have time on there hands);  additionally there are probably people who&#039;ve cut back on entertainment in other forms (movies, theatre, dinner out, etc.  TV is the beneficiary of the current economy.   That being said, there&#039;s no doubt that TV will always play a big role in live sporting events and other high impact programming; but as a medium chances are it will lose share to newer media.  In addition, as more and more people will their TV content from laptops and a smart phones, TV will have to withstand even more competition.  The mother of all mediums won&#039;t go away, but it will play a less dominant role in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For one thing, some of the stats probably only measure the TV being turned on rather than actively watched.  Second, we are in the midst of a recession with high unemployment (folks have time on there hands);  additionally there are probably people who&#8217;ve cut back on entertainment in other forms (movies, theatre, dinner out, etc.  TV is the beneficiary of the current economy.   That being said, there&#8217;s no doubt that TV will always play a big role in live sporting events and other high impact programming; but as a medium chances are it will lose share to newer media.  In addition, as more and more people will their TV content from laptops and a smart phones, TV will have to withstand even more competition.  The mother of all mediums won&#8217;t go away, but it will play a less dominant role in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Peterson</title>
		<link>http://edwardboches.com/television-is-healthier-than-ever-just-a-little-paranoid/comment-page-1#comment-429</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 15:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edwardboches.com/?p=622#comment-429</guid>
		<description>Wow. Assuming 7 hours of sleep and 9 hours of work added to 5 hours of TV watching, there&#039;s a whole lot of life that the average American is cramming into the remaining 3 hours of the day. 

Edward, I&#039;m most curious as to how the television medium will evolve. Surely there must be a natural convergence on the horizon between the PC and the television. Given the audience emancipation that such a platform will provide, there&#039;s your ample reason for the defensive posturing of the TV industry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. Assuming 7 hours of sleep and 9 hours of work added to 5 hours of TV watching, there&#8217;s a whole lot of life that the average American is cramming into the remaining 3 hours of the day. </p>
<p>Edward, I&#8217;m most curious as to how the television medium will evolve. Surely there must be a natural convergence on the horizon between the PC and the television. Given the audience emancipation that such a platform will provide, there&#8217;s your ample reason for the defensive posturing of the TV industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Foster</title>
		<link>http://edwardboches.com/television-is-healthier-than-ever-just-a-little-paranoid/comment-page-1#comment-428</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Foster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 15:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edwardboches.com/?p=622#comment-428</guid>
		<description>TV is not dead. It just has to get smarter. You have to really do something cool and unique to get noticed (while being extremely on-target with your messaging/branding). 

You also may need to make variations of said commercial for a variety of different networks/platforms. The mash-up is probably the best example of how to utilize this. Play user generated content as your commercial. It would be a lot of fun...and get you huge buzz.

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Stuart Foster’s last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheLostJacket/~3/WCP3RMFDIOo/social-media-pr-dalton-roadhouse&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Social Media is to PR as Dalton is to “Roadhouse”&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TV is not dead. It just has to get smarter. You have to really do something cool and unique to get noticed (while being extremely on-target with your messaging/branding). </p>
<p>You also may need to make variations of said commercial for a variety of different networks/platforms. The mash-up is probably the best example of how to utilize this. Play user generated content as your commercial. It would be a lot of fun&#8230;and get you huge buzz.</p>
<p><abbr><em>Stuart Foster’s last blog post..<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheLostJacket/~3/WCP3RMFDIOo/social-media-pr-dalton-roadhouse" rel="nofollow">Social Media is to PR as Dalton is to “Roadhouse”</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

